And as for the found post removal, I did not see them in the history when I viewed it. Some IP's can be rather difficult, and I thought it was the most direct way to do it. The template was just to tell you to start working on the talk page. Based on all this contributing evidence, I am finding it difficult to believe that your deletions are not being made in bad-faith.- 76.17.171.199 03:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Reply.Darthnader37 06:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)' - Pot, you are calling a kettle black.and why is it that whenever I see one of those things, I am the first person who actually has to post in Talk to 'work toward concensus'? Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. I don't appreciate your cut-n-pasted threats on my user-page: 'You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war.You claimed I 'removed no forum refs' in your revert comments - when I clearly did in fact remove several forum posts referenced as sources.I think you are equally well aware of the fact that John Hoffman meets Wikipedia criteria as a notable source, his quotation is pertinent to the topic, and especially since it regards an ongoing controversy and was issued in January 2007, meaning it's also timely.

Why are you attempting to jam them together under the DHT heading (the one which has been resolved)? I think you are well aware that the DHT and superseed/download issues are separate controversies.

This: '.the controversy surrounding the DHT feature actually helped popularize the client, the public seeing the DHT exploit merely as an error on the part of the developer.' is unsourced POV spam, and I think you're smart enough to know it.

Bitcomet blocked comcast windows 10